Joelton.com

Home


Alphabetical Directory
Classified Directory

Community
Community Calendar
JHS Alumni Directory
Church Directory
Civic Group Directory


Community Forum
Letters to the Editor


joelton@att.net


 

SUBMIT news, features, and calendar information

  History & Folklore | Resources | Tennessee Headlines


Letters to the Editor




Memorandum In Opposition To Buffer Disturbance


To The Editor:

The following memorandum was presented to the Metro Stormwater Management Committee regarding Case #200700067. I would like to share it with the community to explain why I oppose a variance at 6410 Eatons Creek Road.
.......

Memorandum In Opposition To Buffer Disturbance

To: Stormwater Management Committee

From: Patrick O’Rourke

Re: Case # 200700067

Date: July 30, 2007

Ladies and Gentlemen,

Petitioner Joe N. Smith comes before you asking permission to disturb the buffer on Long Creek in Joelton for purposes of constructing a 2,000 sq ft retail building and associated parking lot, including a six inch sanitary sewer. My wife and I and a number of our neighbors oppose this disturbance.

Let me say, first of all, that the proposed buffer disturbance is not on an unnamed tributary of Long Creek as purported in the application. This property is within 200 meters of the source of Long Creek and is clearly the headwater of this precious natural resource. See please the map attached as Exhibit A.

The second point I would like to make is that this request does not constitute a minor disturbance of the buffer zone, it asks you to do away with the buffer in its entirety. All but a few feet of this project is directly in the buffer and the building and parking lot, according to the plan submitted by Petitioner, will become the stream bank of this stream.

At this stage I think it is important to remind you that you recently allowed another buffer disturbance just down-stream from this location. The disturbance was to allow for a bridge over Long Creek that will connect a subdivision on White Creeks Pike to Stagner Road.

Also attached hereto as Attachments B1 through B6, you will find pages 33-38 from the Final Version of the 2006 303(d) TDEC Impaired Streams list for Davidson County, a copy of which can also be found on your website. A review of the list tells a frightening story of stream destruction in Davidson County. The main causes of stream destruction on this list are; 1. Discharges from MS4 areas, 2. Hydromodification, 3. Land Development, 4. Siltation, and 5. Collection system failure.

The latest Stream Survey Reports for Long Creek conducted by the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC), the most recent taken on October 6, 2005 and an earlier one on July 26, 2001 (Attachments C-1 and C-2) tell the tale of a stream that is stable with a clear flow and abundant fishes, but has moderate silting and bank stability described as, “moderately unstable; 30-60% of bank in reach has areas of erosion; high erosion potential during floods.” At the present time the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency (TWRA) has instituted a bank erosion rehabilitation project for Long Creek which is ongoing at this time. The increased runoff from the parking lot and roof of this project will be a catalyst for increased erosion.

This proposed building project creates a direct threat to the continued viability of this precious natural resource in all five major areas. Hydromodification is the alteration of the natural flow of water through a landscape, and often takes the form of channel modification or channelization. Many times however, it has greater impacts than benefits in the long run. Almost always, hydromodification results in water quality and habitat impacts.

Channel modification often results in increased in-stream water temperature and unstable conditions that result in both stream bank erosion and deposition of sediment in the stream bed. This creates an environment that doesn't support the plants and animals otherwise present and disrupts the food chain and local ecosystem. Hydromodification can also result in an increase in the amount and rate of pollutants delivered from the upper reaches of watersheds to downstream locations.

My research indicates that there is a growing realization among scientists and engineers that many hydromodification activities, are not only not useful, but are counterproductive, contributing to the general degradation of our natural environment and specifically to the decline of things like public health. As you can see by reading over Attachment B1-B6, many of the streams in Davidson County are polluted with the bacteria Escherrichia coli leading to the issuance of water contact advisory warnings.

The Joelton Community is almost evenly divided into two distinct topographic areas. In one of these areas, which includes the majority of Long Creek, steep slopes of 20 percent and greater, or a rise of 20 feet or more for every 100 feet of horizontal distance and narrow ridges and valleys are the predominant features. In the other area, level to rolling land is the predominant condition, with occasional steep-sided ravines with streams at the bottom. Approximately 10,425 of the community’s 25,313 acres have slopes in excess of 20 percent. Most of these steep slopes are found in a large crescent shaped area that curves from the southwestern section to the northeastern section of the community. Steeply sloping land is normally considered suitable only for very low intensity development, particularly in Davidson County, where such slopes are also covered by unstable soils and are often composed of fragile geological formations.

In conclusion, I would suggest that this one acre project, completely within the buffer, poses a serious threat to this viable and vital natural resource. This is not an issue about sales or property tax, this is a moral issue. On behalf of my family and neighbors we respectfully ask you to deny this request.
.......

Patrick O’Rourke
Joelton


--August 2, 2007


---
Related:
Eatons Creek Stream Buffer Disturbance
Variance Hearing August 2


This is an opinion letter and the views expressed are those of the writer. Joelton.com posts letters to the editor as a community service and is not responsible for the content.

Comment on this letter in the Community Forum


Thank you for visiting
Joelton.com!

Email joelton@att.net

 


COMMENT
on this letter in the
Community Forum

Related:

Eatons Creek Stream Buffer Disturbance Variance Hearing August 2

Community Forum
Long Creek Destruction

Submit your
Letter to the Editor
Please type
"Letter to the Editor"
in the subject line of your message and sign with your name, city and zip code.